Anggraini, Atika (2017) Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi mata pelajaran biologi kompetensi dasar 3.9, 4.9, 3.10, 4.10, 3.11, 4.11 kelas X dalam kurikulum 2013 di SMA Nasional Kota Malang / Atika Anggraini. Diploma thesis, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
ABSTRAK Atika Anggraini. 2017. Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Mata Pelajaran Biologi SMA Kompetensi Dasar 3.9 4.9 3.10 4.10 3.11 dan 4.11 Kelas X Dalam Kurikulum 2013 Di SMA Nasional Kota Malang. Skripsi Jurusan Biologi Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Malang. Pembimbing (I) Drs. Triastono Imam Prasetyo M.Pd (II) Drs. Masjhudi M.Pd. Kata kunci instrumen evaluasi biologi SMA kompetensi dasar 3.9 4.9 3.10 4.10 3.11 dan 4.11 kelas X. Pengukuran merupakan salah satu kegiatan untuk mengetahui kompetensi yang dimiliki siswa. Kompetensi siswa diukur dengan menggunakan suatu instrumen evaluasi yang berkualitas. Teknik pengukuran kompetensi siswa yaitu tes dan non tes. Penelitian ini dilakukan karena sekolah belum melakukan validasi instrumen evaluasi. Penelitian ini mengembangkan tes berupa soal pilihan ganda jawaban tunggal dan asesmen kinerja. Instrumen evaluasi ini sebanyak 55 soal pilihan ganda jawaban tunggal dan asesmen kinerja berupa asesmen laporan asesmen produk asesmen presentasi dan asesmen gagasan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan produk instrumen evaluasi yang telah diuji validitas logis dan validitas empiris Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan model penelitian R D menurut Borg and Gall yang terdiri dari 7 tahap yaitu (1) penelitian dan pengumpulan data (2) perencanaan (3) pengembangan awal desain produk (4) uji coba lapora awal (5) merevisi hasil uji coba (6) uji coba lapangan produk utama (7) revisi produk. Uji coba produk dilakukan di SMA Nasional Kota Malang sebanyak dua kali yaitu uji coba lapangan awal dilakukan pada 12 siswa dan uji coba lapangan produk utama dilakukan pada 34 siswa. Pengumpulan data diperoleh dari hasil validasi ahli evaluasi ahli materi dan ahli lapangan (guru) serta hasil uji coba lapangan awal dan uji coba lapangan produk utama dianalisis dengan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Berdasarkan hasil uji kevalidan instrumen evaluasi soal pilihan ganda jawaban tunggal dari ahli evaluasi ahli materi dan ahli lapangan disimpulkan telah valid. Sedangkan instrumen evaluasi asesmen kinerja berdasarkan hasil uji kevalidan ahli evaluasi disimpulkan telah valid Berdasarkan analisis program ITEMAN diperoleh hasil uji coba lapangan awal pada soal pilihan ganda jawaban tunggal untuk tingkat kesukaran soal mudah 27 27% soal sedang 50 91% dan soal sukar 21 82%. Untuk daya beda negatif diperoleh persentase 3 64% negatif 5 45% jelek 32 73% cukup 40% baik dan 18 18% baik sekali. Untuk analisis pengecoh pilihan jawaban berfungsi mengecoh sebanyak 56 36%. Untuk analisis validitas konstruk diperoleh hasil sesuai dengan indikator soal dan tujuan pembelajaran. Sedangkan validitas isi diperoleh hasil sesuai dengan materi. Berdasarkan hasil uji coba lapangan produk utama pada soal pilihan ganda jawaban tunggal untuk tingkat kesukaran soal mudah 23 647% soal sedang 49 09% dan soal sukar 27 27%. Untuk daya beda jelek diperoleh persentase 5 45% cukup 16 36% baik 54 55% dan baik sekali 23 64%. Reliabilitas instrumen tergolong sangat tinggi dengan nilai 0 912. Untuk analisis pengecoh pilihan jawaban berfungsi mengecoh sebanyak 74 55%. Untuk analisis validitas konstruk diperoleh hasil sesuai dengan indikator soal dan tujuan pembelajaran. Sedangkan validitas isi diperoleh hasil sesuai dengan materi. Saran yang dapat diberikan yaitu instrumen ini bisa digunakan oleh guru pelajaran Biologi namun perlu mengkaji pada beberapa soal karena perbaikan soal harus dilakukan berulang-ulang agar mendapatkan soal yang valid. Penelitian ini perlu dikembangkan lebih lanjut dengan melanjutkan model pengembangan Borg and Gall pada langkah ke 8 9 dan 10. ABSTRACT Anggraini Atika. 2017. Evaluation Instrument Development Senior High School Biology Competence Basic 3.9 4.9 3 10 4 10 3 11 and 4 11 Class X In Curriculum 2013 In SMA Nasional Malang Twice Department of Biology Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences State University of Malang. Counselor (I) Drs. Triastono Imam Prasetyo M.Pd (II) Drs. Masjhudi M.Pd Keywords Evaluation instruments Senior high school biology Basic competencies 3.9 4.9 3.10 4.10 3.11 and 4.11 Class X Measurement is one of the activities to know the competence of students. Student competence is measured using qualified evaluation instruments. Student competency measurement tools are test and non test. This study was conducted because schools have not validated the evaluation instruments. In this research develops test questions of multiple choice answers and performance appraisals. This evaluation instrument provides 55 single choice questions of single answers and performance assessments in the form of report assessment product assessment presentation assessment and idea assessment. The purposeof this study is to produce an evaluation instrument product that has been tested for logical validity and empirical validity . This research development using R D research model according to Borg and Gall which consists of 7 stages there are (1) Research and information collection (2) Planning (3) Develop preliminary form of product (4). Preliminary field testing (5) Main product revision (6) Main field testing (7) Operational product revision. The product trial was conducted in SMA Nasional Malang twice the initial field trial was conducted on 12 students and the main product field trial was conducted on 34 students. Data collection was obtained from the validation of evaluation experts material experts and field experts (teachers) as well as initial field trials and field product trials analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. Based on the result of the Preliminary Field Testing and the evaluation instrument of multiple choice questions the sole answer of the evaluation expert the material expert and the field expert is concluded to be valid. While for the performance evaluation evaluation instrument based on the test results of the evaluator and evaluation experts concluded that it has been valid. Based on the analysis of ITEMAN program obtained preliminary field test results on multiple choice questions single answer for difficulty level of easy problem 27 27% medium problem 50 91% and difficult problem 21 82%. For the negative difference the percentage is 3.64% bad 5.45% enough 32.73% good 40% and very good 18.18%. For the analysis of the deception the tricky choice of answers are 56.36%. For the analysis of construct validity obtained results in accordance with the indicators of problems and learning objectives. While the validity of the content obtained results in accordance with the material. Based on the results of Main Field Testing the question of multiple choice single answer for difficulty level of easy problem 23 647% medium problem 49 09% and difficult problem 27 27%. For the difference of bad difference obtained percentage 5.45% enough 16.36% both 54.55% and very good 23.64%. Instrument reliability is very high with a value of 0.912. For the analysis of deception the tricky choice of answer are 74.55%. For the analysis of construct validity obtained results in accordance with the indicators of problems and learning objectives. While the validity of the content obtained results in accordance with the material. Suggestions that can be given that this instrument can be used by Biology teachers but need to study on some problems because the repairs must be done repeatedly in order to get a valid problem. This research needs to be further developed by continuing Borg and Gall s development model in steps 8 9 and 10.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Diploma) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | ?? ?? |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Matematika dan IPA (FMIPA) > Departemen Biologi (BIO) > S1 Pendidikan Biologi |
| Depositing User: | library UM |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Aug 2017 04:29 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Sep 2017 03:00 |
| URI: | http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/25170 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |