A critical analysis if instructions used in Let's Learn English for SLTP" published by PT Edumedia based on the revised 1994 SLTP English curriculum / by Misianto" - Repositori Universitas Negeri Malang

A critical analysis if instructions used in Let's Learn English for SLTP" published by PT Edumedia based on the revised 1994 SLTP English curriculum / by Misianto"

Misianto (2007) A critical analysis if instructions used in Let's Learn English for SLTP" published by PT Edumedia based on the revised 1994 SLTP English curriculum / by Misianto". Diploma thesis, Universitas Negeri Malang.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Misianto. 2002. A crticul Aruil1t.tios f ln ttnrctitns Jsectln l et s Learn tingLish1 /br SLTP Published by P I Edumedia Based on the llevised 1994 SI T P Iinglish (urriculum. Sarjana Thesis English Department Faculty of Letters State University of Malang. Advisors (l) Dr. Arrvijati W.Murdibjono M Pd. Dip.TESL (2) Drs. AndiMuhtar M.A Key-words Critical Analysis I asks The Revised 1994 SI tP English Cuniculum the instructrons. Englisht extbooksp lay an importantr ole in the teaching-leamlngp rocess becauseth ey cornpriset asks.T he taskss houldb e in line with the objectiveo f learning English as stated in the current curriculum i.e. the 1994 SLTP English Curricuium. The oblective of English instruction is to develop the communicative competoncein cludingl istening s peaking r eading a nd writing skills. Thrs studya ttemptst o find out the answersr vhethero r not the general oblectives( l uiuanP embelularun( lmum) of reading l istening s peakinga nd writing stated in the revised 1994 SLl l English Curriculurn are applied in Let s Learn Englishl publishedb y PT Edumedia. -l his studyc oncernst he analysiso 1a tcxtbook c rnployinga descriptive analysis.T he analysisi s on the basiso f fbur criteria i .e. ( I ) the readingi nstructions in the textbooks houldr natcht he generalo triectiveso freading statedi n the revised ( lll l (2) the listeningi nstructionisn thc tcxtbooks houldm atcht he general obiectiveso f listenings tatedin the revised( )llPl (3) the speakingin structionisn the textbook should match the general oblectives of speaking stated in the revised GRI l and (4) the writing instructions in the textbook should match the general objectives of writing stated in the revised GBPP. The data arc analyzed by comparing the instructions in the textbook with the general objectives of reading listerung speaking and writing stated in the revised GRPP. From the analysis f our main conclusionsa re drawn as follows I The readingi nstructionsa ret he leastc ommunicativew hich meanst he instructions do not deserve to be used. Thel isteningin structionasr e Thes peakingin structionasr e instructioniss veryl imited. communicativea lt houghth eirn umberis limited. vervc orrlnunicativael thous thh en umbero f the 4. The textbookp rovidess tudentsw ith enoughc ommunicativew riting instructions to do writingt asksa ndt het nstructioncso vera ll thef bur generaol bjectiveosf lTltrns. Based on the result o fthe analysis t hrees uggestionas re addressedto three groupso fpractitionerst e xlbookr vritersL. lnglishte acheros fS/ 77)u singt he textbook a nd otherr esearchers. The textbookw riters r vhoa re responsiblefb r the writing of the rnaterials shouldp aym orea ttentionto the generaol biectiveso freading l istenings peaking andw riting in sucha way that all instructionsa re evenlya blet o coper vith the objectrvesT.h e writer shoulda voidm akingi nstructionos1 tasksa trstyingo nly certaino bjectivesT. he instructionso f listeningt asksu sedi n the textbook f or examplef a il to satisfyo ne ofthree oblectives. The Englisht eacherso f SI l Pu singt he textbooks houldn ot uset he reading instructionsb ecauseth ey are the leastc ommunicatrves o they shoulds upplyt heir own instructionslb llorving good characteristicos f communicativeta sk-reading. Otherr esearchersh ouldm entiono thera spectsto study e .g.t he task c ontent ofthe taski tself k indso finteractiona ndl earninga ctivitiess o thata comprehensivc intbnnation of tasks used in the textbook can be lraincd

Item Type: Thesis (Diploma)
Subjects: ?? ??
Divisions: Fakultas Sastra (FS) > Departemen Sastra Inggris (ING) > S1 Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Depositing User: Users 2 not found.
Date Deposited: 22 Jan 2007 04:29
Last Modified: 09 Sep 2007 03:00
URI: http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/10505

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item